View Full Version : What Time is it?......Dilfer Time
Ravenfan_11
10-01-2007, 07:02 AM
On top of the fact that our defense is suddently ordinary, now we have to listen to the "Dilfer let go by the Raven's" thing all week.
<Barf>
:grbac:
PARavensJeff
10-01-2007, 08:58 AM
Is Dilfer going to start this week? I saw Alex Smith was taken off with a shoulder injury Sunday but haven't heard anything else about his condition. Anyone else know? We'll really hear about it all week if he starts!!! :grbac:
Don't get the wrong idea, I liked Trent when he was here, but what is done is done. It was 6 years ago, let it go.
camdenyard
10-01-2007, 08:59 AM
Alex Smith separated his shoulder. He isn't going to play Sunday.
52decleetzu
10-01-2007, 11:48 AM
Alex Smith separated his shoulder. He isn't going to play Sunday.
Yes he has already been ruled out for Sunday,and Dilfer looked absolutely horrendous when he had to go in the game.Looks like a team we are playing finally got the short end of the stick injury wise.
RavenScallywag
10-01-2007, 12:09 PM
To be honest, the media has nothing else, as far as Trent Dilfer goes...The only significant things about Dilfer are his son he lost to a terrible illness (which no one should touch and rightly so) and him being the only QB to ever win a SB and then be released by the team.
Media will bring it up, but we shut him up when he was in Cleveland...he doesn't have a leg to stand on in this argument.
PARavensJeff
10-01-2007, 01:10 PM
To be honest, the media has nothing else, as far as Trent Dilfer goes...The only significant things about Dilfer are his son he lost to a terrible illness (which no one should touch and rightly so) and him being the only QB to ever win a SB and then be released by the team.
Media will bring it up, but we shut him up when he was in Cleveland...he doesn't have a leg to stand on in this argument.
I agree, but Trent wasn't released, he was a FA after the SB. The contract he signed in the summer of 2000 was only a 1 year deal for $1 million. There were no options or other things tying him to the team. That's my memory, but maybe I am wrong. It wasn't like Elvis' contract, where we didn't p/u the option & he was gone.
FHRaven
10-01-2007, 01:14 PM
I agree, but Trent wasn't released, he was a FA after the SB. The contract he signed in the summer of 2000 was only a 1 year deal for $1 million. There were no options or other things tying him to the team. That's my memory, but maybe I am wrong. It wasn't like Elvis' contract, where we didn't p/u the option & he was gone.
I believe you are correct.
SF has really been hit with injuries. Time to get back on track Sunday.